<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Are You Watering Your High Dollar Pages?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.brandon-hopkins.com/are-you-watering-your-high-dollar-pages/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.brandon-hopkins.com/are-you-watering-your-high-dollar-pages</link>
	<description>I think, then write.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 07:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Andrew. Fredericksburg Lawyer.</title>
		<link>http://www.brandon-hopkins.com/are-you-watering-your-high-dollar-pages#comment-6545</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew. Fredericksburg Lawyer.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 01:16:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brandon-hopkins.com/?p=224#comment-6545</guid>
		<description>My temptation in this situation would be to focus on moving "blue widgets" to the number one spot.  Even if it's not as big a money-maker as "widgets," there's a lot better chance to make it to the top spot.

And if the bigger keyword is encompassed *within* the other keyword ("widgets" is in "blue widgets"), you'll still be working on its ranking as well.  Or maybe I missed something.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My temptation in this situation would be to focus on moving &#8220;blue widgets&#8221; to the number one spot.  Even if it&#8217;s not as big a money-maker as &#8220;widgets,&#8221; there&#8217;s a lot better chance to make it to the top spot.</p>
<p>And if the bigger keyword is encompassed *within* the other keyword (&#8221;widgets&#8221; is in &#8220;blue widgets&#8221;), you&#8217;ll still be working on its ranking as well.  Or maybe I missed something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
