<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Are You Watering Your High Dollar Pages?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.brandon-hopkins.com/are-you-watering-your-high-dollar-pages/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.brandon-hopkins.com/are-you-watering-your-high-dollar-pages/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2012 00:15:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brandon</title>
		<link>http://www.brandon-hopkins.com/are-you-watering-your-high-dollar-pages/comment-page-1/#comment-6945</link>
		<dc:creator>Brandon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 17:38:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brandon-hopkins.com/?p=224#comment-6945</guid>
		<description>Andrew, going for the long tail keywords has always been a priority for me.  Recently I had a site jump from 50 to 9 for the primary keyword and it makes about 4x what all of the long tail keywords combined were making.  Sometimes a little real world examples make me change my mind on what is best!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrew, going for the long tail keywords has always been a priority for me.  Recently I had a site jump from 50 to 9 for the primary keyword and it makes about 4x what all of the long tail keywords combined were making.  Sometimes a little real world examples make me change my mind on what is best!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew. Fredericksburg Lawyer.</title>
		<link>http://www.brandon-hopkins.com/are-you-watering-your-high-dollar-pages/comment-page-1/#comment-6545</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew. Fredericksburg Lawyer.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 01:16:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brandon-hopkins.com/?p=224#comment-6545</guid>
		<description>My temptation in this situation would be to focus on moving &quot;blue widgets&quot; to the number one spot.  Even if it&#039;s not as big a money-maker as &quot;widgets,&quot; there&#039;s a lot better chance to make it to the top spot.

And if the bigger keyword is encompassed *within* the other keyword (&quot;widgets&quot; is in &quot;blue widgets&quot;), you&#039;ll still be working on its ranking as well.  Or maybe I missed something.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My temptation in this situation would be to focus on moving &#8220;blue widgets&#8221; to the number one spot.  Even if it&#8217;s not as big a money-maker as &#8220;widgets,&#8221; there&#8217;s a lot better chance to make it to the top spot.</p>
<p>And if the bigger keyword is encompassed *within* the other keyword (&#8220;widgets&#8221; is in &#8220;blue widgets&#8221;), you&#8217;ll still be working on its ranking as well.  Or maybe I missed something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 10/16 queries in 0.011 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 147/218 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.brandon-hopkins.com @ 2012-05-17 00:46:16 -->
