<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Keyword Stuffing and Domain Names &#8211; Does it Matter?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.brandon-hopkins.com/keyword-stuffing-and-domain-names-does-it-matter/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.brandon-hopkins.com/keyword-stuffing-and-domain-names-does-it-matter</link>
	<description>I think, then write.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 16:56:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan@Friends&#38;Money</title>
		<link>http://www.brandon-hopkins.com/keyword-stuffing-and-domain-names-does-it-matter/comment-page-1#comment-7178</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan@Friends&#38;Money</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2009 17:34:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brandon-hopkins.com/?p=226#comment-7178</guid>
		<description>I agree that keyword stuffing is less relevant and having a domain with one of your keywords in it makes little difference. I do however think that you need to have your keywords repeated upto 10 times in the body of the text. However you should always write content for readers, not for search engines</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that keyword stuffing is less relevant and having a domain with one of your keywords in it makes little difference. I do however think that you need to have your keywords repeated upto 10 times in the body of the text. However you should always write content for readers, not for search engines</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linda P</title>
		<link>http://www.brandon-hopkins.com/keyword-stuffing-and-domain-names-does-it-matter/comment-page-1#comment-6884</link>
		<dc:creator>Linda P</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 15:48:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brandon-hopkins.com/?p=226#comment-6884</guid>
		<description>Well, my domain name was second choice but it totally sums up what my site is about and what I do - so I&#039;m glad I ended up with it. I think it must have been fate.... spooky!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, my domain name was second choice but it totally sums up what my site is about and what I do &#8211; so I&#8217;m glad I ended up with it. I think it must have been fate&#8230;. spooky!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: m4r</title>
		<link>http://www.brandon-hopkins.com/keyword-stuffing-and-domain-names-does-it-matter/comment-page-1#comment-6862</link>
		<dc:creator>m4r</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 05:56:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brandon-hopkins.com/?p=226#comment-6862</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d always thought that &quot;keyword stuffing&quot; was putting a high density of keywords into page content and META tags.
I think having keywords in the domain name is definitely an advantage, as is putting them in title and heading tags.
I think it&#039;s good to vary them up a bit though, create what Aaron Wall calls a &quot;semantically related cloud&quot; - this way the SE can get the picture of what your site is about, but the density of one particular phrase as opposed to other related content is not too skewed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d always thought that &#8220;keyword stuffing&#8221; was putting a high density of keywords into page content and META tags.<br />
I think having keywords in the domain name is definitely an advantage, as is putting them in title and heading tags.<br />
I think it&#8217;s good to vary them up a bit though, create what Aaron Wall calls a &#8220;semantically related cloud&#8221; &#8211; this way the SE can get the picture of what your site is about, but the density of one particular phrase as opposed to other related content is not too skewed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danny Cooper</title>
		<link>http://www.brandon-hopkins.com/keyword-stuffing-and-domain-names-does-it-matter/comment-page-1#comment-6759</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny Cooper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 14:05:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brandon-hopkins.com/?p=226#comment-6759</guid>
		<description>On lower competition keywords, having the keyword in the domain definetly helps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On lower competition keywords, having the keyword in the domain definetly helps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tison</title>
		<link>http://www.brandon-hopkins.com/keyword-stuffing-and-domain-names-does-it-matter/comment-page-1#comment-6724</link>
		<dc:creator>Tison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 00:33:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brandon-hopkins.com/?p=226#comment-6724</guid>
		<description>Jacques, I have to agree with you, however, I think that is what Brandon is saying: having a &#039;brandable&#039; domain like &quot;Google&quot; may cause you a loss in keyword-related traffic, but would be more easily remembered if seen in a magazine than say &quot;Professional Search Engine Inc.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jacques, I have to agree with you, however, I think that is what Brandon is saying: having a &#8216;brandable&#8217; domain like &#8220;Google&#8221; may cause you a loss in keyword-related traffic, but would be more easily remembered if seen in a magazine than say &#8220;Professional Search Engine Inc.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: digitalfrog</title>
		<link>http://www.brandon-hopkins.com/keyword-stuffing-and-domain-names-does-it-matter/comment-page-1#comment-6626</link>
		<dc:creator>digitalfrog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 07:21:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brandon-hopkins.com/?p=226#comment-6626</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve always thought that having keywords in the domain name was a huge advantage. thats what all the SEO programs tell you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve always thought that having keywords in the domain name was a huge advantage. thats what all the SEO programs tell you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacques Seoman</title>
		<link>http://www.brandon-hopkins.com/keyword-stuffing-and-domain-names-does-it-matter/comment-page-1#comment-6559</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacques Seoman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 20:59:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brandon-hopkins.com/?p=226#comment-6559</guid>
		<description>It is generally considered that a keyword rich domain name will be more successful than a non keyword rich domain name.....provided all other factors are equal!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is generally considered that a keyword rich domain name will be more successful than a non keyword rich domain name&#8230;..provided all other factors are equal!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
